John 10:19-30 seems to be just a reference back to the on-going
disputations recorded in chapter 9. It is not entirely clear if this is a
continuation of the previous interchange or a different and subsequent date.
The Jews ask a question that was already answered. He had also given them
miraculous signs of His authority. They had both words and power. What did they
want? Jesus answered that question too. They did not believe because they were
not His sheep, and did not know Him. He does not dwell on reasons why they do
not know Him. But He simply says that He knows His sheep, they hear His voice
and follow Him, and He gives them eternal life. He adds a new revelation. No
one can snatch them out of His hand, because His Father is greater than all and
no one can snatch them out of the Father's hand. And then the clincher,
answering the question they asked, He declares that He and the Father are
one. There is no clearer claim to deity
in all of the New Testament.
There is further elaboration on this
in John 17, in which Jesus prays to the Father for His disciples, and makes
clear the Father's role in their lives.
John 10:31-42 The Jews had previously picked up stones to stone
Jesus in John 8:59 after Jesus had declared His deity by saying, "before
Abraham was, I AM", identifying Himself as one with YHWH. Instead of
leaving as in that case, this time He tries to engage them in discussion. The
Jews claim to be following the Law of Moses, which required the death penalty
for blasphemy (Leviticus 24:16). Jesus responds with a quote from Psalm 82:6,
which is in the context of a rebuke of unjust judgments. In the first five
verses the Psalmist says that God will take a stand and judge the unjust
judges, those who show partiality to the wicked. The Psalmist urges the rulers
to vindicate the weak, orphans, the afflicted, and the needy. The Psalmist goes on to explain that the
unjust judges walk in spiritual darkness, even though they are gods and are
sons of the Most High. Nevertheless they will die like men and fall like
princes who are judged. Jesus then once
again cites the witness of the miraculous signs that He had performed as
evidence that the Father was in Him and He was in the Father. The fourth commandment (Exodus 20:7) is to
not take the name of YHWH in vain. Perhaps what Jesus was trying to convey by
these contrast of verses, is that doing good in God's name is not taking His
name in vain. It is the opposite, claiming His name to justify evil, that is taking
it in vain.
Since they rejected His explanation,
Jesus avoided arrest by escaping out of their hand. The text gives no further
details on how Jesus avoided arrest. He went to the place mentioned in John
1:28, and many people came to Him there. The logic seems strained. John
performed no sign, but had borne witness to Jesus (John 1:29-36), and therefore
many people believed in Jesus there. The people had accepted John as a prophet
and so his testimony had some weight, but Jesus did miraculous signs. Of
course, Jesus had pointed to all of the different types of witness in John
5:33-47. But at this point many began to believe in Him. Not in the Temple, but
at the place in the wilderness where John had baptized many.
No comments:
Post a Comment